rel
This commit is contained in:
+5
-2
@@ -815,7 +815,6 @@ As mentioned in the previous section, there is a way to define morphisms in $\sp
|
|||||||
\arrow["{p_2}"', from=2-1, to=2-2]
|
\arrow["{p_2}"', from=2-1, to=2-2]
|
||||||
\end{tikzcd}
|
\end{tikzcd}
|
||||||
\end{gather*}
|
\end{gather*}
|
||||||
\end{example}
|
|
||||||
For morphisms
|
For morphisms
|
||||||
\begin{gather*}
|
\begin{gather*}
|
||||||
(f,g,w)\c(X \stackrel{p_1}{\leftarrow} R \stackrel{p_2}{\to}Y)\to(Y \stackrel{q_1}{\leftarrow} S \stackrel{q_2}{\to}Z)
|
(f,g,w)\c(X \stackrel{p_1}{\leftarrow} R \stackrel{p_2}{\to}Y)\to(Y \stackrel{q_1}{\leftarrow} S \stackrel{q_2}{\to}Z)
|
||||||
@@ -873,7 +872,7 @@ As mentioned in the previous section, there is a way to define morphisms in $\sp
|
|||||||
\arrow["{c_V}"', from=2-2, to=2-3]
|
\arrow["{c_V}"', from=2-2, to=2-3]
|
||||||
\end{tikzcd}
|
\end{tikzcd}
|
||||||
\end{equation*}
|
\end{equation*}
|
||||||
So, $(w,v,u)$ is a morphism of type $(R \stackrel{c_R}{\leftarrow} R\odot W \stackrel{c_W}{\to}W)\to(S \stackrel{c_S}{\leftarrow} S\odot V \stackrel{c_V}{\to}V)$. So, we define $(f,g,w)\odot(g,h,v)=(w,v,u)$. To define the natural isomorphisms is a cumbersome task, but it is known in the literature.
|
So, $(w,v,u)$ is a morphism of type $(R \stackrel{c_R}{\leftarrow} R\odot W \stackrel{c_W}{\to}W)\to(S \stackrel{c_S}{\leftarrow} S\odot V \stackrel{c_V}{\to}V)$. So, we define $(f,g,w)\odot(g,h,v)=(w,v,u)$. To define the natural isomorphisms is a cumbersome task, but it is known in the literature. Additionally, showing that $\rel(\BC)\rightrightarrows\BC$ is also a double category is almost the same. The functors are defined the same, except that the functor $\odot$ takes the image of the pullback over its legs, instead of the pullback itself.
|
||||||
% The following diagrams help to see why the defined $\odot$ is a functor.
|
% The following diagrams help to see why the defined $\odot$ is a functor.
|
||||||
% \begin{equation*}
|
% \begin{equation*}
|
||||||
% \begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=\&]
|
% \begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=\&]
|
||||||
@@ -958,6 +957,10 @@ As mentioned in the previous section, there is a way to define morphisms in $\sp
|
|||||||
% \arrow["{c_{V'}}"', from=4-8, to=3-9]
|
% \arrow["{c_{V'}}"', from=4-8, to=3-9]
|
||||||
% \end{tikzcd}
|
% \end{tikzcd}
|
||||||
% \end{equation*}
|
% \end{equation*}
|
||||||
|
\end{example}
|
||||||
|
\begin{example}
|
||||||
|
\todo{Talk about $\spa_a$ and $\rel_a$.}
|
||||||
|
\end{example}
|
||||||
\section{Coalgebraic Bisimulation}%\label{sec:}
|
\section{Coalgebraic Bisimulation}%\label{sec:}
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
%\begin{definition}[Relation Lifting]
|
%\begin{definition}[Relation Lifting]
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user